Original article

J. GNUS1, A. CZERSKI1,2, S. FERENC1, W. ZAWADZKI1,2,
W. WITKIEWICZ1, W. HAUZER1, A. RUSIECKA1,2, J. BUJOK


IN VITRO STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF SOME SELECTED AGONISTS
AND ANTAGONISTS OF ALPHA
1-ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS ON THE CONTRACTILITY
OF THE ANEURYSMALLY-CHANGED AORTIC SMOOTH MUSCLE IN HUMANS



1General and Vascular Surgery Ward, Regional Specialist Hospital in Wroclaw, Research and Development Centre, Wroclaw, Poland;
2
Department of Animal Physiology and Biostructure, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland


  The study included 18 sections of the aneurysmally-changed abdominal aortas, obtained from patients of the Provincial Specialist Hospital in Wroclaw and 18 sections of normal abdominal aortas obtained from swine. The collected samples were placed horizontally in the incubation chamber. Changes in their transverse section area were registered. They were stretched to a tension of 5 mN. Krebs-Henseleit buffer was used as the incubatory environment. Incubation of the sections was performed at a temperature of 37°C, in the gaseous mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide used in the following proportion: 95% of O2 and 5% of CO2. Contractions of the aorta were registered with isotonic transducers (Letica Scientific Instruments). In the studies, we examined the influence of 1-adrenergic receptors (and their subtypes 1A, 1B, 1D) on the contractility of the aortic muscle in humans and swine by their stimulation or inhibition with some selected agonists or antagonists. This time, it was shown that the stimulation of 1-adrenergic receptors leads to contractions of the human and swine aortic muscle; the observed increase in the muscle tone may follow from the stimulation of all subtypes of alpha-1 receptor (1A, 1B, 1D). All three subtypes of 1-adrenergic receptor are engaged in vasoconstriction, especially of 1A and 1D subtypes; the 1B subtype is less significant for aortic contractility. The contractile response of the aneurysmally-changed abdominal aorta in humans to agonists of a-adrenergic receptors was significantly less intense than that of the normal porcine aorta. It can be concluded that aneurysms influence the contractile response of the aorta.

Key words: 1-adrenergic receptor, aneurysm, aorta, contractility, tone, adrenoceptors, phentolamine, hypertension



INTRODUCTION

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) constitute two most common diseases with an indication for elective surgery of the abdominal cavity. Aneurysm is a local widening of the arterial lumen by 50%, as compared to the normal, unchanged part of the artery, right above the aneurysm (1-4). This is a relatively common ailment, found in older individuals mostly. The majority of the cases are asymptomatic. The process of arterial widening follows gradually, over a few years, leading to the rupture of the aneurysm, which often results in patient's demise. The most common location of the aneurysm is the abdominal aorta, right below the renal arteries, but the pathological process may involve other arteries as well.

Mechanical properties of arteries, i.e. their stretching potential, are conditioned by the presence of two proteins: collagen and elastin. Collagen of the arteries is mostly of the I and III type and is constantly produced by arterial smooth muscles, throughout the whole life. Collagen deficits in the arterial wall may be effectively reversed if the mechanisms of synthesis are efficient and the cause of collagen damage is quickly eliminated. Collagen is a protein that is not susceptible to stretching forces. It is more like a scaffolding of a vessel. The second protein building the vessel is the elastin. This is a stretchable protein which provides vessel elasticity allowing for heart-related changes in the vascular diameter. Elastin is not synthesised in the aortic wall of adults. Its half-time is 70 years, so its amount in the aortic wall decreases with age, which leads to aortic weakening and aneurysm formation, as a consequence of coexistence of many other predisposing factors.

Normal contractility of the abdominal aorta is extremely important in the regulation of the lumen diameter and blood pressure. The influence of the adrenergic system, and especially of the 1-adrenergic receptors, is also of significance in this process. The 1-adrenergic receptors regulate many processes in the brain (all their subtypes), smooth muscles (1A and 1D -adrenergic subtypes), liver (1A and 1B -adrenergic subtypes), heart, and prostate (1A-adrenergic subtype).

The aim of this work was to show the effects of agonists and antagonists of 1-adrenergic receptors on the contractility of aortic smooth muscles within the aneurysmally-changed aorta of humans and the normal aorta obtained from pigs, as well as to show the effects of the abdominal aorta aneurysm on the contractility.


MATERIAL AND METHODS

The experiments were conducted on 18 sections of normal abdominal aortas obtained from pigs weighing from 50 to 70 kg and on 18 sections of aneurysmally-changed abdominal aortas from humans. The human material for the study was collected during elective surgeries of aneurysm correction conducted at the Provincial Specialist Hospital in Wroclaw. Patients from whom the aortic samples were collected, were operated on in an elective or emergent setting, due to an extensive, life-threatening aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board.

The size of aorta sections collected for examination from pigs and from humans, was the same, i.e. 0.5x1 cm. The human samples were transported in the Krebs-Henseleit buffer, at 4°C. Transport time did not exceed 1 hour. Any atherosclerotic plaque together with the endothelium were removed from the delivered aorta with the help of a scalpel. The sections were placed horizontally in 4 chambers of the automatic water bath, with a volume of 20 ml each. Every section was punctured at its edges with a needle, and a surgical thread safil 4.0 was inserted through the holes. All the samples were stretched to a tension of 5 mN. That tone was a baseline used for comparisons of the obtained results (5, 6). The time required to balance the record was determined experimentally at 20 minutes (7). The Krebs-Henseleit buffer was used as the incubation environment. It consisted of NaCl - 118 mM, KCl - 4.7 mM, CaCl2 - 2.5 mM, MgSO4 - 1.6 mM, NaHCO3 - 24.3 mM, KH2PO4 - 1.18 mM, and glucose 5.6 mM (5, 7). Incubation of the sections was carried out at a temperature of 37°C, in the gaseous mixture of oxygen and carbon dioxide used in the following proportion: 95% of O2 and 5% of CO2, in order to obtain the pH value of 7.3-7.5. Aortic contractions were registered with isotonic transducers Letica Scientific Instruments) combined with bridge amplifiers (BridgeAmp, ADInstruments, Australia), a 4-channel data acquisition system (PowerLab/400, ADInstruments) connected with a Macintosh computer. Spontaneous contractile activity of the aortic muscle was recorded for 20 minutes (8). Afterwards, agonists and antagonists of adrenergic receptors were introduced to the incubation chambers with an isolated section material. The following chemical substances were added: adrenaline - i.e. agonist of - and ß-adrenergic receptors (Sigma-Aldrich), phenylephrine - agonist of 1-adrenergic receptors (Sigma-Aldrich), prazosine - antagonist of 1-adrenergic receptors (Sigma-Aldrich), phentolamine - antagonist of 1- and 2-adrenergic receptors (Sigma-Aldrich), cyclazocine - antagonist of 1B receptors (Sigma-Aldrich), L-765314 - antagonist of 1B receptors (Sigma-Aldrich), BMY 7378 - antagonist of 1D receptors (Sigma-Aldrich), 5-methylurapidil - antagonist of 1A receptors (Sigma-Aldrich).

Doses of the preparations were established experimentally by 10-fold dilutions. When defining the experimental dose, we introduced the preparation to the incubation chamber, starting with the highest dilution and not washing the chamber between the administration of subsequent doses (which led to the accumulation of the doses), until a visible effect was obtained on the chart. The experimental dose was defined as the lowest concentration of the preparation, leading to the required effect confirmed in a few subsequent experiments.

The following experimental designs were used in the study:
  1. an agonist was introduced to the incubation chamber, with dose accumulation
  2. an antagonist was introduced to the incubation chamber, with dose accumulation
  3. an antagonist, followed by phenylephrine, was introduced to the incubation chamber, with dose accumulation
Between particular experiments, the incubation chambers were rinsed with Krebs- Henseleit buffer at a temperature of 37°C, three times, and the whole buffer was always removed from the chamber. Only one type of substance was always tested on one section. Before another substance was introduced, the chamber was washed with distilled water and the section was changed for a different one.

When evaluating the obtained results, we analysed the strength of contractions expressed in mN (contractility amplitude). The results of the tests were processed with the use of Microsoft Office Excel 2000 spreadsheets and analysed statistically with Student's t-test and a single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) for independent variables.


RESULTS

Sections of the aneurysmally-changed abdominal aorta, obtained from individuals during elective surgeries of aneurysm correction had a long life-span and could survive in vitro for 6-8 hours. The survival time was similar for aortic sections collected from pigs (no statistically significant differences). Proper handling of the section material was very important. After sampling, the material was washed in a cooled Krebs- Henseleit buffer several times, to get rid of blood and all impurities. The sections had to be transported to the in vitro laboratory as soon as possible. Not following the commonly accepted transportation procedures results in a slow death of the sampled material. After 20 minutes of control recording (during which the strength of the muscle tone stabilised and the metabolic activity of the tissue was rising due to temperature and oxygenation increase), agonists and antagonists of adrenergic receptors were added to the incubation chamber, in the system of accumulated doses, starting from the lowest concentration. Sections of porcine abdominal aortas were handled in the same manner i.e. stored in a cool buffer for 30 minutes. Both the aneurysmally-changed abdominal aorta from humans and the normal porcine aorta respond to the administration of selected agonists and antagonists with muscle tone change. An increase (vasoconstriction) or a decrease of muscle tone (dilatation) is observed. Figs. 1-5 show the obtained results, for a better visualisation of changes and differences in the contractility of aneurysmally-changed aortas and normal porcine aortas.

Fig. 1. Influence of different doses of adrenergic antagonists on the contractile activity of smooth muscle cells of human abdominal aortic smooth muscle.

Fig. 2. Influence of different doses of adrenergic antagonists on the contractile activity of smooth muscle cells of swine abdominal aortic smooth muscle.

Fig. 3. A comparison of contractile activity of the aneurysmally-changed abdominal aorta in humans and of porcine abdominal aorta (control group) in response to the administration of agonists of -adrenergic receptors in the system of dose accumulation.

Fig. 4. Influence of blocking the subtypes of -adrenergic receptors with particular agonists and antagonists on the contractile response of the aneurysmally-changed abdominal aorta in humans to phenylephrine administration in the system of dose accumulation.

Fig. 5. Influence of blocking the subtypes of -adrenergic receptors with particular agonists and antagonists on the contractile response of the porcine aorta to phenylephrine administration in the system of dose accumulation.


DISCUSSION

The study material comprised of section samples of the abdominal aorta changed by aneurysms and of normal abdominal aortas collected from sows. The human material included sections collected from patients subjected to surgery of aneurismal correction. The age of those patients ranged from 60 to 92 years. Their mean age was 73 years, which proves that aortic aneurysms develop in individuals over 60, this is at least when surgery is needed. Very often, such patients have many comorbidities apart from the aneurysm. In the study group, there were 3 patients with diabetes, 13 with hypertension, 11 with heart diseases, and one with lung and CNS disease. Most of the patients (13 individuals) did not reveal any symptoms of disease connected with the presence of the aneurysm of the abdominal aorta. Three patients were operated on in acute emergency procedures due to aneurismal rupture, and two showed symptoms of pain of the sacrolumbar spine and abdomen. Clot in the aortic lumen was found intraoperatively in all cases; in 4 cases, there was wall thickening and atherosclerotic changes, and in 13 patients there was a thin-walled aneurysm.

The 1-adrenergic receptor belongs to stimulating receptors, and it is heterogeneous, which means that it has different subtypes. According to the current classification developed by the International Union of Pharmacology Subcommittee on Nomenclature for Adrenoceptors, there are 3 subtypes of 1-adrenergic receptor: 1A, 1B, and 1D (9-15). The 1-adrenergic receptor is connected with calcium signaling, which means that its stimulation leads to an increased concentration of intracellular calcium ions (5, 16-18). The signal is transmitted from the receptor to the cell, by means of such enzymes as: phospholipase C (PLC), phospholipase D (PLD), and phospholipase A2 (19, 20). Studies have shown that the effectiveness of 1-adrenergic receptors in increasing the intracellular concentration of calcium ions is as follows: 1A> 1B> 1D. Apart from different subtypes of 1-adrenergic receptor in humans, there are also nine splice variants of the 1A -adrenergic receptor, i.e. 1A-1, 1A-2a, 1A-3a, 1A-4, 1A-2b, 1A-2c, 1A-3c, 1A-5, 1A-6 (10, 21-24).

The experiments showed that the stimulation of the -adrenergic receptor causes a contraction of the aortic muscle, both the normal one (swine), as well as the pathologically changed one (humans). There was a correlation between tissue reaction and agonist concentration. With increasing concentration, the intensity of the contraction was increasing as well (Fig. 3). Aneurysmally-changed aortas showed a significantly less intense reaction to agonists of a-adrenergic receptors as compared to porcine aortas (Fig. 3). The strength of the contraction is lower. The size of the sections used for examinations was the same for humans and for swine. This shows that aneurysms inhibit the contractility and aortic muscle reaction to agonists of -adrenergic receptors.

Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta reveal features of a chronic inflammation, destructive reconstruction of the extracellular matrix, decreased number of smooth muscle cells in the tunica media, and a significant reduction of its thickness, as well as neovascularisation (25, 26). As it may be noticed, aneurysms significantly change aortic biomechanics, by influencing the processes of lumen regulation.

The authors distinguished four phases of contraction after -adrenergic agonist administration: 1) phase of a rapid increase, lasting for about 1 minute, with contraction strength of up to 2 g; 2) phase of a slow increase, lasting for 1.5 minute, on average, with contraction strength of up to 3 g; 3) plateau phase lasting for about 4 minutes, with no change in the muscle tone; 4) phase of muscle relaxation, lasting for about 4.5 minutes, with a slow dilatation of the aortic muscle (27, 28). The important factor was the previous removal of the aortic endothelium which significantly reduces muscle contractility and muscle reaction to agonists, which was proved by many authors (7, 27-30). Differences in the contraction strength may also follow from the method of section placement in the incubation chamber (21).

Blockade of -adrenergic receptors with phentolamine (nonselective antagonist of a-adrenergic receptor) results in the lack of contractions in response to adrenaline and phenylephrine (Fig. 4, 5). As shown in the study, these are the -adrenergic and not the ß-adrenergic receptors that are engaged in the observed vasoconstriction of the aneurysmally-changed aortic muscle in humans and of the normal porcine aorta. Administration of phentolamine alone leads to aortic muscle dilatation (Figs. 1, 2).

Blockade of that receptor with prazosine (nonselective antagonist of 1-adrenergic receptor) leads to the absence of tissue reaction to phenylephrine. Administration of prazosine to the incubation chamber resulted in a gradual dilatation of the muscle tissue, which confirms the role of 1-adrenergic receptor in the regulation of aortic vasoconstriction (Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5). Maybe the 1-adrenergic receptor is stimulated in vitro by agonists - endogenous noradrenaline secreted in the aortic wall, by postganglionic fibres of the sympathetic system (31). Similar results were obtained in other animals, when the influence of phenylephrine on arterial contractility was studied. In vitro studies showed that stimulation of 1-adrenergic receptor by intravenous phenylephrine caused constriction of the arterial vessels in pigs (32) and dogs (26, 33). The researchers showed a significant increase in the muscle tone of the arterial vessels, leading to an increased arterial blood pressure of the examined animals. Blockade of 1A-adrenergic receptor with 5-methylurapidil resulted in a decrease of the aortic muscle tone in humans and swine (Figs. 1, 2) and in a decrease of muscle reaction to phenylephrine Figs. 4, 5).

The results confirmed the presence of 1A-adrenergic receptors in the aortic muscle and its effects on contractility. and suggested a key role of this receptor subtype in aortic vasoconstriction caused by the stimulation of 1A-adrenergic receptor. The 1A-adrenergic receptor is not the only receptor influencing the aortic vasoconstriction. Blockade of 1B-adrenergic receptors by administration of cyclazocine to the incubation chamber resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the muscle tone (Figs. 1, 2). Blockade of that receptor on the other hand caused a decrease in aortic muscle reaction to phenylephrine (Figs. 4, 5). However, the observed changes are much less pronounced than those registered for the 1A-adrenergic subtype. Analogous results were obtained with a blockade of 1B-adrenergic receptor by addition of L765314- selective antagonist of 1B receptor and blockade of 1D-adrenergic receptor by administration of BMY 7378 to the incubation chamber. (Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5).

The literature showed the influence of subtypes of 1- adrenergic receptor on blood vessels in animals. According to Willems et al. (32), phenylephrine influences the contractility of the carotid aorta in dogs, especially by means of 1A and 1D adrenergic receptors; the 1B subtype is less significant for aortic contractility. The authors showed that blocking the 1A-adrenergic receptor in dogs by administering 5-methylurapidil and BMY 7378 at a dose of 100 µg/kg intravenously, reduced the response to phenylephrine by approx. -20±8%, and a dose of 300 µg/kg completely blocked the response. Abound et al. (21) showed that the administration of 5-methylurapidil, benoxanthian and WB 4101 to the incubation chamber decreased the aorta contraction strength in rats in response to noradrenaline. Blockade of 1B-adrenergic receptor by addition of L-765314 at a dose of 1000 µg/kg did not have any influence on tissue reaction to phenylephrine (26, 34, 35). The role of 1B-adrenergic receptor in aortic vasoconstriction in dogs seems controversial. On the other hand, this receptor seems to have a crucial role in contractions of the spleen and splenic vessels, leading to blood expel from the spleen to the peripheral vessels (16). Administration of BMY 7378 blocked the 1D-adrenergic receptor in the aorta of the rats, leading to the dilatation (30, 36). However, its influence on vasa deferentia contractions was not that significant (37). There are different theories on the mutual functional coexistence of 1A and 1D adrenergic receptors in the regulation of vasoconstriction of the renal arteries in rats (30). Subtypes 1B and 2B, on the other hand, did not show any effects on the regulation of contractility of the arterial vessels in dogs (32) but they took part in regulating the contractions of the resistance arteries of the skin in rabbits (1B) (38) and renal arteries in rats (2B) (11).

The presented results as well as literature data confirm the influence of 1-adrenergic receptors on the aortic contractility and show a considerably lower contractile ability of the aneurysmally-changed tissue due to stimulation of 1-adrenergic receptor, as compared to a normal abdominal aorta. This phenomenon seems to be connected with histological changes in the aortic wall, accompanying aneurysm formation (20, 33). The observed loss of elastin and collagen, apoptosis of myocytes of smooth muscles and degradation of the tunica media in the aneurysmally-changed vessel not only inhibit the contractile and elastic function of the abdominal aorta in humans, but also change the reaction of that tissue to stimulation of 1-adrenergic receptors.

Acknowledgments: This publication is a part of the project "Wrovasc - Integrated Cardiovascular Centre", co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, within the Innovative Economy Operational Program, 2007-2013; "European Funds - for the development of innovative economy"

Conflict of interests: None declared.



REFERENCES
  1. Ailawadi G, Eliason JL, Upchurch GR, Arbor A. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 584-588.
  2. Noszczyk W. Surgery of peripheral arteries and veins. Warszawa, PZWL, 1998.
  3. Thompson RW, Geraghty PJ, Lee JK. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: basic mechanisms and clinical implications. Curr Probl Surg 2002; 39: 110-230.
  4. Wasseff M, Baxter BT, Chisholm RL, et al. Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a multidisciplinary research program supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34: 730-738.
  5. Eckert RE, Karsten AJ, Utz J, Ziegler M. Regulation of renal artery smooth muscle tone by 1-adrenoceptors: role of voltage-gated calcium channels and intracellular calcium stores. Urol Res 2000; 28: 122-127.
  6. Low AM, Darby PJ, Kwan CY, Daniel EE. Efects of thapsigargin and ryanodine on vascular contractility: cross-talk between sarcoplasmic reticulum and plasmalemma. Eur J Pharmacol 1993; 230: 6153-6214.
  7. Caryl EH, Joyce E, Shaun LS. Mechanisms underlying spontaneous rhythmical contractions in irideal arterioles of the rat. J Physiol 1999; 521: 507-516.
  8. Gnus J, Czerski A, Zawadzki W, et al. in vitro contractility of normal and aneurysmal abdominal aorta muscle coat sections in human and animals material. Folia Biologica (Cracow) 2012; 60: 71-77.
  9. Brodde OE, Michel MC. Adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in the human heart. Pharmacol Rev 1999; 51: 651-690.
  10. Bylund DB, Eilenberg DC, Heible JP, et al. International Union of Pharmacology nomenclature of adrenoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 1994; 46: 121-136.
  11. Docherty JR. Subtypes of functional 1- and 2-adrenoceptors. Eur J Pharmacol 1998; 361: 1-15.
  12. Hieble JP, Bondinell WE, Ruffolo RJ. - and -adrenoceptors: from the gene to the clinic. Molecular biology and adrenoceptor subclassifcation. J Med Chem 1995; 38: 3415-3444.
  13. Hieble JP, Ruffolo JR. Subclassification and nomenclature of 1- and 2-adrenoceptors. Prog Drug Res 1996; 47: 81-130.
  14. Langer SZ. History and nomenclature of 1-adrenoceptors. Eur Urol 1999; 36: 2-6.
  15. Liang GH, Park S, Kim JA, Choi S, Suh SH. Stimulation of large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger inhibitor dichlorobenzamil in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells and mouse aortic smooth muscle cells. J Physiol Pharmacol 2009; 60(1): 143-150.
  16. Han C, Abel PW, Minneman KP. al-adrenoceptor subtypes linked to different mechanisms for increasing intracellular Ca2+ in smooth muscle. Nature 1987; 329: 333-335.
  17. Minneman K. Alpha 1- adrenergic receptor subtypes. Inositol phosphates and sources of cell calcium. Pharmacol Rev 1988; 40: 87-93.
  18. Suzuki E, Tsujimoto G, Tamura K, Hashimoto K. Two pharmacologically distinct alpha 1-adrenoreceptor subtypes in the contraction of rabbit aorta: each subtype couples with a different Ca2+ signaling mechanism and plays a different physiological role. Mol Pharmacol 1990; 38: 725-730.
  19. O'Donnell SR, Wanstall JC. Beta-1 and beta-2 adrenoreceptor-mediated responses in preparations of pulmonary artery and aorta from young and aged rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1984; 228: 733-739.
  20. Walsh MP. Regulation of vascular smooth muscle tone. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1994; 72: 919-935.
  21. Aboud R, Shafii M, Docherty JR. Investigation of the subtypes of 1-adrenoceptor mediating contractions of rat aorta, vas deferens and spleen. Br J Pharmacol 1993; 109: 80- 87.
  22. Lomasney JW, Cotecchia S, Lorenz W, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of the cDNA for the 1A-adrenergic receptor. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 6365-6369.
  23. Pecanha FM, Wiggers GA, Briones AM, et al. The role of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 derived prostanoids on vasoconstrictor responses to phenylephrine is increased by exposure to low mercury concentration. J Physiol Pharmacol 2010; 61: 29-36.
  24. Stephenson JA, Summers RJ. Autoradiographic analysis of receptors on vascular endothelium. Eur J Pharmacol 1987; 134: 35-41.
  25. Lopez-Candalez A, Holmes DR, Liao S, Scott MJ, Wickline SA, Thompson RW. Decreased vascular smooth muscle cell density in medial degeneration of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Am J Pathol 1997; 150: 993-1007.
  26. Willems EW, Valdivia LF, Ramirez-San JE, Saxena PR, Villalon CM. Pharmacological identifcation of the major subtypes of adrenoceptors involved in the panine external carotid vasoconstrictor efects of adrenaline and noradrenaline. Life Sci 2001; 69: 143-153.
  27. Angus JA, Cocks TM, Sato K. The alpha adrenoreceptors on endothelial cells. Fed Proc 1986; 45: 2355-2359.
  28. Furchgott RF. Role of endothelium in responses of vascular smooth muscle. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxiocol 1984; 24: 175-179.
  29. Nilsson H. Interactions between membrane potential and intracellular calcium concentration in vascular smooth muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1986; 1664: 559-566.
  30. Villalobos-Molina R, Lopez-Guerrero JJ, Ibarra M. 1D- and 1A-adrenoceptors mediate contraction in rat renal artery. Eur J Pharmacol 1997; 322: 225-227.
  31. Hoffman BB, Lefkowitz RJ. Catecholamines, sympathomimetic drugs, and adrenergic receptor antagonists. In: Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, JG Hardman, LE Limbird, PB Molinoff (eds), New York, McGraw-Hill Professional 1996, pp. 199-248.
  32. Willems EW, Valdivia LF, Saxena PR, Villalon CM. The role of several 1- and 2-adrenoceptor subtypes mediating vasoconstriction in the canine external carotid circulation. Br J Pharmacol 2001; 132: 1292-1298.
  33. Dashwood M, Jacobs M. Autoradiographic study of the alpha-adrenoceptors of rat aorta and tail artery. Eur J Pharmacol 1985; 115: 129-135.
  34. Cotecchia S, Schwinn DA, Randall RR, Lefkowitz RJ, Caron MG, Kobilka BK. Molecular cloning and expression of the cDNA for the hamster 1-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85: 7159-7163.
  35. Schwinn DA, Lomasney JW, Lorenz W, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of the cDNA for a novel 1-adrenergic receptor subtype. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 8183-8189.
  36. Perez DM, Piascik MT, Graham RM. Solution phase library screening for the identification of rare clones: Isolation of an 1D-adrenergic receptor cDNA. Mol Pharmacol 1991; 40: 876-883.
  37. Vargas HM, Gorman AJ. Vascular 1A adrenergic receptor subtypes in the regulation of arterial pressure. Life Sci 1995; 57: 2291-2308.
  38. Smith K, Macmillan JB, McGrath JC. Investigations of 1-adrenoceptor subtype mediating vasoconstriction in rabbit cutaneous resistance arteries. Br J Pharmacol 1997; 122: 825-832.

R e c e i v e d : June 28, 2011
A c c e p t e d : January 31, 2012

Author’s address: Dr. Albert Czerski, 31 K.C. Norwida Street, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland; e-mail: alb5@tlen.pl